“And I
may say, once and for all, carefully weighing my words, that in no part of the
world I have seen stones cut with such mathematical precision and admirable
skill as in Peru, and in no part of Peru are there any to surpass those which
are scattered over the plain of Tiahuanaco.”
[Ephraim George Squier, Incidents of Travel and Exploration in the
Land of the Incas, 1877, p. 279]
Cusco, the famous stone of the twelve angles, masterpiece of megalithic stone masonry. [Photo by Author] |
The megalithic architecture of the Andean altiplano of Peru and Bolivia is indeed
remarkable. It has the same clear and neat lines that only ancient Egypt was
able to express, and then only briefly over the course of the IV Dynasty of the
Old Kingdom. Yet, very often, what is labelled as “Inca architecture” has little if
anything to do with the Incas, a people conquered by the Spanish conquistadores in 1533 and whose empire
stretching over much of today’s Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Chile and parts of
Argentina lasted for almost two hundred years since the late XIII Century AD or
the beginning of the XIV Century AD. Indeed, most architectural historians and
archaeologists have now come to recognize in the megalithic architecture of the
Peruvian and Bolivian highlands the legacy of much older civilizations, including
the Wari and the Tiwanaku empires, whose history already stretched back several
centuries (perhaps even millennia) by the time the Incas became lords of the land.
Over the last couple of decades, architectural
historians such as Jean Pierre Protzen and Stella Nair have addressed the
mystery of how a civilization with no knowledge of the wheel and which only
possessed rudimentary copper tools and chisels could have quarried,
transported, dressed and fitted enormous blocks of hard granite, porphyry and
andesite stone with the almost supernatural precision that one can see in the
ancient sites of Peru and Bolivia. [1,2]
Even though their experiments have been able to
shed some light on the techniques that, even with very rudimentary tools, could
have been used to craft perfectly planar surfaces, accurate right angles and millimeter
wide joints, many aspects of ancient Andean stone cutting and architecture
remain unexplained.
One of the most puzzling and debated issues
with Andean megalithic architecture is the apparent vitrification of the stone
surfaces one notices at several ancient sites. If rocks were indeed vitrified, as some historians claim, their ancient builders ought to have possessed some yet
unknown means by which they were able to soften, melt and in some cases vitrify
enormous masses of rock, making it extremely easy to carve stone as hard as
granite and andesite in any kind of desired shapes and angles.
The most prominent features of these “vitrified”
rocks include:
- A shiny, glossy appearance that reflects light like a mirror
- The presence of a “layer” on the surface of the stone, where the apparent vitrification is visible
- Evidence of vitrification in places where it would be illogical or simply impossible to achieve a similar level of polish by any other more conventional technique (such as hammering, chiseling or polishing with an abrasive substance such as sand or quartz powder)
- An evident discoloration or change in color and texture of the stone in areas where the vitrification phenomenon is apparent
- Marks in the stone or other evidence that might suggest that the stone was indeed molten or softened at some point during construction
- The presence of a residual magnetic charge in the stone, detectable by means of a compass (although it is unclear how this might be related to the vitrification observed, if at all)
- The sockets where metal clamps would have been inserted to join together adjacent blocks of stone are often visible in stones that bear traces of vitrification (with the sockets or T-Grooves also showing signs of vitrification)
Below is an overview of some of the anomalies
and apparent traces of vitrification we have been able to document at several
Peruvian sites.
Cusco, Qorikancha
A set of perfectly aligned windows inside the Qorikancha,
the “Golden Enclosure” of ancient Cusco. [Photo by Author]
|
The Qorikancha,
meaning “Enclosure of Gold” was the
most important state temple of the Inca Empire, in the heart of their capital
city of Cusco. The ruins of the Qorikancha survive underneath the modern day
church and convent of Santo Domingo, and are universally recognized as one of
the finest examples of Inca stonework in the so-called “Imperial style” using
large, squared blocks of granite or andesite. Indeed, a number of elements may
suggest an even older origin for the temple, perhaps dating back to the time of
the Wari and Tiahuanaco empires (these include the presence of T-Grooves
designed to host metal clamps, typical of Tiahuanaco architecture but absent
from Inca construction techniques, as well as some controversial astronomical
alignments that might point to an even earlier construction date. [3])
The architecture of the Qorikancha is both
imposing and austere. The interior is divided in a number of rooms facing a
central courtyard, while the outer walls rest on an imposing series of terraces
towards the river Huatanay (now little more than a streamlet), that culminate
in an impressive curved wall likely built for some astronomical purposes. The
stones that compose this outer wall show a remarkable degree of polish. Although
these stones do not bear any clear signs of vitrification, their almost metallic
finish and mirror-like polish is indeed remarkable.
The wonderful outer wall of the Qorikancha
facing Calle Ahuacpinta. It is possible to appreciate the very tight joints and
the indenting between the stones.
|
Another view of the outer wall of the Qorikancha facing Calle Ahuacpinta. The horizonal joints are also vitrified. [Photo by Author] |
The outer wall facing Calle Ahuacpinta is
perhaps the most remarkable as it shows a number of features that testify to
the extreme skill of the ancient stonemasons. The wall is entirely built of
pinkish-gray granite, using neatly fitted and joined rectangular blocks. Even
though the vertical joints are rarely perpendicular, the horizontal joints run
almost perfectly straight.
If observed from close enough, however, the joints
reveal something truly remarkable. First of all, each stone possesses a slight,
almost imperceptible indentation, so that even the horizontal joints are never
truly horizontal, but designed in such a way that each stone would be “locked”
in place by means of tiny indentations in each of the adjoining stones. Nevertheless,
the joints are so tight as to be barely visible and not even the proverbial
sheet of paper could be fitted in between two stones.
The amount of work required to
achieve such a perfect fit while keeping tiny indentations between the blocks
would be unconceivable by any modern standard, and can only find justification
in the high seismicity of the region (perfectly horizontal and perpendicular
joints would have caused the stones to slide during an earthquake, while the
tiny indentations would have kept them tightly into place). In addition to this
very peculiar fit between the blocks, the joints (especially the horizontal
joints) appear to be vitrified. A shiny, vitrified layer can be seen at night between
the joints or by pointing a flashlight parallel to the wall. There is no
explanation as to how this level of vitrification was achieved or why. From a
structural point of view, however, the vitrification of the joints would have conferred
the wall an almost indestructible strength making it extremely resistant even
to the most violent earthquakes.
Vitrification, however, is not limited to the
joints. A few stones in the interior of the Qorikancha also show evidence of
glazing as if covered by a vitrified film or layer that reflects
light. Oddly enough, this coating seems to have been hammered or chiseled away
at some point, leaving the stone with a much rougher appearance (why or when
this was done remains the subject of speculation, although this might be a
consequence of the walls being stuccoed and painted during colonial times).
A dark corridor inside the Qorikancha well
expresses the severe and monumental character of this structure. [Photo by Author]
|
A remarkable niche inside the Qorikancha, with
drilled holes and mysterious grooves. [Photo by Author]
|
The gigantic fortress of Sachsaywaman dominates
the city of Cusco from a hill. Some of the stones used for its construction
weigh in excess of 250 to 300 tons, and are fitted together with remarkable
accuracy. Many of the stones employed in the construction of the fortress
appear molten, as if they had been artificially softened and fitted into place,
some of them even bearing partially vitrified “scars” suggestive of the
application of very intense, concentrated heat.
One of the megalithic gateways leading into the
great fortress of Sachsaywaman, above the city of Cusco [Photo by Author]
|
Some of the strange marks or scars visible on
certain stones at Sachsaywaman appear to be the product of intense heat applied
to the stone and are also partially vitrified. [Photo by Author]
|
The most remarkable signs of vitrification are
however found on rocks on the hill facing Sachsaywaman (called Rodadero because
of the round shape of the vast stone amphitheater that was carved into its
summit). A particular rock platform called the “Throne of the Inca” has
perfectly planar, partially vitrified surfaces cut in steps, which also appear
to be heavily magnetic. Many of the nearby stones are also carved into steps,
often forming long stairways, niches and altars.
Even though the severe
weathering of the rock surfaces would have removed or concealed any sign of
vitrification, the rocks (some of them weighing hundreds of tons) appear to
have been cracked and split by intense heat that permanently altered the color
and texture of the stone. Where the stone has been somehow protected from the
weather, vitrification is however evident.
A vitrified tunnel near the Chincana Chica on
the hill of Rodadero. Not the mirror polish on the walls and on the ceiling.
[Photo by Author]
|
Cusco – Q’Enko
The great cave of Q’Enko. The surfaces of the
altars and tables show clear signs of having been vitrified. [Photo by Author]
|
A detail of a vitrified stone surface on the side of one of the altars in the cave of Q'Enko. Vitrification appears as a thin layer on the surface of the stone. [Photo by Author] |
Q’Enko is located on a rocky outcrop a short
distance from Sachsaywaman and is divided in two areas called Uchuy Q’Enko
(meaning “Little Q’Enko) and Q’Enko proper. Uchuy Q’Enko has more of the
strangely carved rocks and cyclopean walls reminiscent in style of the
constructions of Sachsaywaman. The rock surface contains many carvings that might
have once been chambers and corridors that are now open to the air and badly
weathered. The extreme weathering of the stone is even more puzzling if one
considers that it is entirely composed of very hard andesite stone, a rock very
similar to basalt. One particular trench cut into the rock is very much
suggestive of a portcullis system connected to a small canal, with parallel
grooves clearly visible on both sides of the trench.
The main cave of Q’Enko, believed to be used in
funerary rituals, contains several tables and altars (for lack of any other
suitable functional explanation) whose surface is entirely vitrified.
Cusco – Temple of the
Moon (and Temple of the Monkeys)
The little know Temple of the Moon (and the
nearby Temple of the Monkeys) are two rarely visited sites located in the vicinity
of Q’Enko. The so-called Temple of the Moon is in fact a large rocky outcrop
containing many caves where altars and other structures have been carved into
the living rock. The most remarkable of these caves, containing a large
ceremonial platform or altar and accessed through a short descending stairway, is entirely vitrified both on the walls and the ceilings. Vitrification of the
rock surface is so extensive that the stone shines and reflects the light like
a mirror. One can see his own image reflected on the walls and the ceiling as
if they were entirely made of polished glass. Similar traces of vitrification
are also found on a large altar inside the Temple of the Monkeys, where erosion
has left exposed a system of underground chambers and passageways.
The steps leading into the cave of the Temple
of the Moon. Note the mirror-like reflection of the stairway on the left wall.
[Photo by Author]
|
Another view of the cave of the Moon, from
inside. All the walls and ceilings are entirely vitrified. [Photo by Author]
|
Ollantaytambo
The great fortress of Ollantaytambo rests on a
steep terraced hill dominated by the gigantic megalithic walls of the temple of
the Sun, guarding one of the accesses to the Sacred Valley near Cusco.
Ollantaytambo is most famous for the six giant porphyry
megaliths, each weighing in excess of 70 tons, which form the façade of the
Temple of the Sun (the original appearance of this massive megalithic structure
is still the subject of speculation). Similar to the Qorikancha, Ollantaytambo
shows signs of different epochs of construction, with the megalithic phase
being the earliest and the most refined. Enormous blocks of stone lie scattered
around the summit and at the base of the hill, many of which were later
reemployed in the much cruder construction of the late Inca period.
Interestingly, some of the stones must have been already badly weathered and
damaged when they were reused. Several stones also possess T-grooves for
holding metal clamps, which are strongly reminiscent of Tiahuanaco
architecture.
A perfectly drilled hole in a fallen block of
porphyry at Ollantaytambo. Notice the thin grooves and tool marks left inside the hole. [Photo by Author]
|
The cyclopean masonry leading up to the top of
the hill is the finest in Peru, showing a level of polish and accuracy which is
almost unparalleled in the ancient world and gives it the appearance of
polished metal rather than stone. The protruding bosses that one can see on the
surface of many of the stones (and which are also a prominent feature in
megalithic buildings in Cusco and elsewhere) were certainly used for the
lifting and transportation of the colossal blocks of stone, even though one
wonders at the reason why they were left to protrude out of the stone even
after the stones had been dressed and fitted into place. Perhaps construction
was abandoned and the building was left unfinished at some early stage of
completion, but this is hard to reconcile with the degree of polish and the perfect finish of other parts of the
wall.
Among the stones found at Ollantaytambo are pink-red
porphyry, gray andesite, black basalt and diorite. No doubt, the chromatic
effect of so many different colored stones would have been beautiful. The
joints between the stones, including the largest monoliths, appear to have been
vitrified as they are coated in a thin reflective layer. This can clearly be
observed where certain stones have been removed from the construction. Not only
was the edge of the joints vitrified, but the whole stone surface experienced a
similar process. What is interesting is that vitrification was apparently
limited to the joints or the contact surface with the adjoining stones, but is
not usually present on the outer face of the stone (which is polished, but not
vitrified). This would suggest two rather obvious conclusions at this point:
- Vitrification served some functional or structural purpose, and was not done for aesthetic reasons (otherwise the outer face of the stone, the only one that would have remained visible, would have been subject to vitrification too)
- Vitrification, being only superficial and only in portions of the stone that would have been hidden from sight and therefore not exposed, must be intentional and not the consequence of fire or another catastrophic event
One last point of contention is whether the
vitrified layer is indeed part of the stone or rather constitutes a separate
vitreous substance applied to the stone (perhaps as a sort of cement or
concrete).
This last question is not easily answered. Even
though the vitrified surface appears almost as a layer on the stone, it
nevertheless appears to be the result of some physical or chemical
transformation of the stone itself rather than being just attached to it. Also,
vitrification is not only found in masonry, but also in the natural bedrock, in
caves and tunnels.
Sadly, very little analysis has been done to
determine the composition of the vitrified layer and whether it is chemically
or physically different from the stone itself. Some samples collected from a
set of vitrified caves and tunnels at a site called Tetecaca, above the city of
Cusco were purportedly analyzed by the University of Utrecht, Holland. Microscope
photographs have revealed two clearly distinct regions, the vitrified layer and
the stone underneath. The presence of a transition layer, which is also clearly
visible in photographs, suggests however that the vitrified surface and the
stone body are not separate but are indeed one and the same, although the
surface of the stone has certainly undergone a physical transformation.
Interestingly, however, the chemical
composition of the surface layer appears to be at least partially different
from that of the body stone, as it contains elements not present in the natural
rock samples. This suggests that a kind of glaze composed of mostly silica was
applied to the stone under conditions of extreme heat and pressure. [4]
Even if these results were confirmed with more
evidence from other sites, it remains to be explained how a similar glaze could
be applied to the stone and how the required temperatures (well above 1,000
degrees Celsius) and pressures could be reached and maintained in the open air
outside of a large furnace.
Note: Other vitrified stones are found in the
city of Cusco itself and in the nearby sites of Tambomachay, Chincheros and the
“Zona X” (which will be the subject of a future article). Vitrified stonework
is also found at Machu Picchu, although limited to the joints between the
stones of the Temple of the Three Windows and the Main Temple plaza.
References
[1] Jean Pierre Protzen, Inca Architecture and Construction at Ollantaytambo, Oxford
University Press, 1993
[2] Jean Pierre Protzen and Stella Nair, The Stones of Tiahuanaco: A Study of
Architecture and Construction, The Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 2013
[3] Rolf Muller, Die Intiwatana (Sonnenwarten) im alten Peru, Berlin, Verlag von D.
Reimer, 1929
[4] Jan Peter de Jong, Evidence of Vitrified Stonework in the Inca Vestiges of Peru, http://janpeterdejong.weebly.com/vitrified-stones.html
has jean pierre protzen offered an explanation for the vitrification?
ReplyDeleteThese t-clamps occur in Egypt, and the Great Wall of China, where it ends at the ocean!
ReplyDeletesee also: vitrified catles in Britain (https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4326)
ReplyDeleteand thanks again for your great work!!!
Very good article
ReplyDeleteI also think that the Incas could not have created all this by themselves, for a simple reason: I KNOW SOMETHING VERY SIMILAR TO THIS CLASS OF MEGALITIC RUINS OUTSIDE PERU, IN A PLACE WHERE THE INCAS COULD NOT HAVE ARRIVED, HIDDEN AND LOST IN THE MOUNTAINS OF ANOTHER COUNTRY, VERY AWAY FROM PERU
I would like to add something on this subject: I am very sure that this same kind of megalithic architecture came to Mexico, I do not lie, which may sound crazy, because there are no archaeological reports about something like that in Mexico, but I myself received On the part of a friend an image where megalithic constructions of Inca class are observed, lost in a mountain of the state of Mexico,
Something you should know is that Mexican archeology suffers from censorship and constant disguise, I do not know why they do that, but it is not the first time INAH has silenced the discoveries of "anomalous and out of the ordinary" archeological sites, that censorship Is all the time and more specifically against large-scale megalithic archaeological sites
Those rumors about incredible palaces and huge cities made of gigantic megalithic stones in Mexico very much like the Incas in Peru were true, and have been silenced all the time because they can not be explained by the "experts and institutes"
If you are interested in knowing more, please contact me at my email or reply to my comment right here, thanks
pd: Ignore my profile picture, I'm not a troll, in the teacher giorgio tsoukalos I'm just an independent researcher like you who wants to discover the truth
excuse me my bad english
DeleteHi Giorgio,
DeleteI have been trying to contact you concerning these ruins you mention in central Mexico but have not been able to get through your mailbox. Is there any other way I can contact you?
hello again, if you want we can talk right here, and I'll send you my mail
Deleteaccording to my friend who took the photo, in which you can see 4 huge blocks of granitic stone with a size of 4 to 6 feet high, protruding from the mountain floor, this city is made of huge megalithic stones, with a size from 5 feet to more than 15 feet high, the size of the stones vary from medium to large blocks to many meters long and tall
in that place also exists a perfectly carved monolithic pyramidal temple of approximately more than 30 feet of height
is located a few kilometers from malinalco, very close to the monolithic cuauhcalli malinalco, and also very close to the border with the state of morelos and cuernavaca,
I can tell the location of the place to visit and see if it is true, with a condition
I do not know what karma would have mexico with the megalithic ruins of type "advanced ancestral technology" as those mentioned by the theorists of the ancient astronauts, because all those ruins and temples and archeological sites of type and perfect construction and that seem made with advanced technology are usually ignored and censored in Mexico, never come to light, nor are they shown to the public in general, not even in Peru or Bolivia the institutes hide this kind of places, make them known and make them famous, such as machu picchu or puma punku, but in the case of mexico is not so, this kind of places always keep them in secret and out of the view of the public and the Mexican people that you never enter anything
DeleteI am also an independent researcher, and I have researched quite a lot on the internet and I have found many legends stories and all sorts of records about anomalous sites found in Mexico and of which nothing is known, most of these records are about anomalous sites and outside of the common, and they come from the times of the conquest until recent times,
what I have noticed is that these strange and unusual places are usually of the megalithic type, monolithic or even of exotic types,
for example a large underground temple made entirely of polished marble that was found long ago in xochicalco, appeared the news on this remarkable discovery in an old newspaper of cuernavaca, many decades ago, exists a "stela" in the same place that in fact it is not a stele but a pillar of polished marble in the place, perhaps you will have seen it yourself, the stele of the two glyphs, which resembles more a marble pillar or a constructive megalithic block than a stele
I can pass information on my research, so that you travel to certain strange places and locate them, I just want some things: credit on the information and location of these sites, I want to be mentioned as the discoverer of these sites, without offending, and that you send me as many photos as you can, take many photos of the places that I will mention
I can not travel to these places because of my young age (I'm 20 years old) and because I have a lot of work and duties where I live, and I do not have enough money to do these trips, you could travel to these places for me and photograph them, I would appreciate it if I did, we would both benefit
is the only thing I want, recognition and credit for discovering these places and take many photos as you can,
thank you and I await your response
Thank you, Giorgio.
DeleteThis information sounds extremely interesting. I would be happy to document these sites. Of course you or your friends would be given full credit for the discovery. Is there a way I can contact you in private to discuss more about the location of the sites? Perhaps you can also send some pictures? I have sent you a private message through Google+, but not sure this has reached you. You can reply directly to that one or to this post.
Sounds like you have done lots of research on these ancient ruins, and you deserve all credit and recognition if these turn out to be genuinely ancient sites. I would be happy to organize an expedition to document them and make them known to a broader public.
Giorgio, you can contact me directly at this email address: unchartedruinsblog@gmail.com
DeleteExcellent work! You are one of the pioneers of what I call "protohistory": the history before recorded history. I believe the ancients used scalar/torsion technology to dress, vitrify, and construct their megalithic monuments. Also, there is some evidence that stone-softening substances, perhaps derived from plants, was used. Ivan Sanderson reported this and Col. Fawcett observed it. You and Brien Foerster and others are doing very important work in Central and South America.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Desertdan
DeleteThere is still so much to discover about our ancient megalithic past and the many enigmas posed by these ruins. It is interesting to find the same style of construction in so many places around the world. In a previous article I cover the cyclopean architecture of Central Italy, which bears a striking similarity to that of Peru. I am currently investigating a number of megalithic structures in Mexico at Teotihuacan, Malinalco and Tezcotzingo that show possible signs of advanced machining comparable to those found on ancient structures in Egypt and Peru. In a future article I will also discuss the evidence for cyclopean/ polygonal masonry among the earliest construction layers of Xochicalco and Tula, also in Mexico.
Of course I always welcome everyone to report new sites that could be worth investigating.
Very interesting article. Thank you for your excellent work; really enjoy the pictures too. The ancient people who built the megalithic structures in Peru actually left a recorded history. They arrived in South America around 600 BC and the record covers through about 421 AD. The people were called Nephites named after their early leader Nephi (pronounced "knee fi"). Nephi kept a record on metal plates that were passed down from generation to generation with many other leaders adding their own record of their times. A final writer named Mormon wrote an abridgement of the many, many records and added some pages of his own. This record has since been translated and published in over 70 pages and is called the Book of Mormon. You can get a free copy from mormon.org or buy one at amazon or a bookstore. Yes, the book is considered scripture by the Mormon church (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints) as the ancient writers combine a good deal of their religious teachings along with the history of the people. But even if you have zero interest in religion, you should find the historical aspect of the book most interesting. For example, here is an excerpt from Nephi regarding the building of a temple which I believe was what is now called Coricancha as mentioned in this article.
ReplyDelete15 And I did teach my people to abuild buildings, and to bwork in all cmanner of wood, and of diron, and of copper, and of ebrass, and of steel, and of fgold, and of silver, and of precious ores, which were in great abundance.
16 And I, Nephi, did build a temple; and I did construct it after the manner of the temple of Solomon save it were not built of so many precious things; for they were not to be found upon the land, wherefore, it could not be built like unto Solomon’s etemple. But the manner of the construction was like unto the temple of fSolomon; and the workmanship thereof was exceedingly fine."
Not wanting to endorse the Mormon religion was the main reason that the institute of the Smithsonian hide, destroyed, etc all that archaeological evidence from sites that were investigated by their people, as well as other archaeologists. You would think that if their ideals (of evolution, apparently) were of the truth, that they would not need to cover up and destroy evidence from sites, guess there will always be people who think like that.... that magically what they believe can become the truth by destroying the work of other people. I hope that some sort of translatable library of the ancients or Hall of Records is found very soon, and by those that can publish it before it gets hidden. The Egyptologists have penetrated deep into the great pyramid during that time , belive its was a year, of 'renovations'. They have yet to publish what eet they have found, hopefully they are not stealing the contents. Oh, and just to understand something, 600 BC is old, but not ancient. The megaliths belong to an earlier epoch, the oldest of such are 15,000 BC or earlier. The culture apparently continued to just after the great flood of Noah's time , the disappeared around the time we give for the Tower of Babel occurrence.
DeleteHi , I've read a few things on this site and I really do think that it has helped tremendously. There's still a heap I need to learn thus can continue learning and can keep coming back.
ReplyDeleteThanks.Sand suppliers in Bangalore
Hi, I have been studying our ancient origins for a few years now and have visited many ancient sites in Thailand, Cambodia, India, Peru, and Mexico. I will be traveling back to Mexico in a few weeks for an extended journey and would like to be involved in studying and documenting megalithic structures in central and southern Mexico. If you would like to join up and research together sometime that would be an honor. You can reach me @ shultzdaniel77@gmail.com Hope to hear from you soon.
ReplyDeleteSorry, I forgot to put a name. Daniel
ReplyDeleteI have been studying these megalithic structures for only a short time, but am convinced that the technologies used to manipulate the shape of these huge stones are more advanced than what exists in modern times. Would be happy to exchange thoughts with any of you who share an interest in this compelling subject. - Bill Chambers
ReplyDeleteFurther to my above comment on July 17, 2020, I can be contacted at chamberswill@gmail.com.
ReplyDeleteThe interlocking grooves would seem to be for stability, as the region is prone to earthquakes.
ReplyDeleteAs for the vitrification, a strong possibility exists that the builders of the sites were attacked with heat, to be cooked alive. The vitrification of megalith stones all around the globe, which is common, should be categorized and dated. Did it happen in mass around one time in ancient history, or more than one time?
I think that Percy Fawcett's account of the plants that the Indians told him that the ancients used to melt stones to build the megalithic structures deserves to be researched. It was mentioned just in passing in one of his books. As far as I know, no one has taken this seriously, and researched it.
ReplyDelete