Part I - The Valley of Mexico
“A great, scientific instrument lies sprawled over the entire surface of
the globe. At some period, thousands of years ago, almost every corner of the
world was visited by people with a particular task to accomplish. With the help
of some remarkable power, by which they could cut and raise enormous blocks of
stone, these men created vast astronomical instruments, circles of erect
pillars, pyramids, underground tunnels, cyclopean stone platforms, all linked
together by a network of tracks and alignments, whose course from horizon to
horizon was marked by stones, mounds and earthworks”
[John Michell, The New View over Atlantis,
Thames & Hudson, Reprinted 2001]
This is the first part of a
series of articles on what will be considered by many as a very controversial
subject. The topic is that of the alignment and placement of ancient sites. There
are many theories and speculations on why a particular location was chosen for
the placement of ancient pyramids, ancient temples and sanctuaries,
ranging from Giza’s Orion correlation theory to New Age
beliefs in the existence of such things as ley lines and
Earth energies.
A
number of studies and the advances in the still relatively new discipline of
archaeoastronomy have revealed important elements of the connection between the
ancients and the Sky. Nevertheless, when this approach is applied outside of a single site or
landscape feature to encompass multiple ancient sites (as in the case of the
Egyptian pyramids or the ancient city of Angkor, in Cambodia), the results are,
at best, controversial.
Even
more controversial is the idea that the placement of ancient sites, even over
very long distances, would be ruled by geodetic or mathematical proportions having little or no connection at all with the local geography or other strategic reasons usually advocated for explaining the location chosen for the founding of a city or a temple.
Geodesy,
that is the science of measuring of the Earth, is not something commonly ascribed to ancient civilizations. The accurate
determination of latitude and longitude has only been possible in relatively
modern times, with the invention of precision chronographs. While latitude can
be calculated with sufficient accuracy with the help of a quadrant or
astrolabe, by observing the altitude of the sun or of certain “fixed” stars above the horizon, the problem of longitude
remained without a solution until the invention of the marine
chronometer in 1773. [1]
Without
such knowledge, establishing a “grid” or
network of ancient sites over a large enough area would have been highly
unpractical, if not impossible. This is why such a theory of long-distance
alignments of ancient sites – which would moreover need
to take into account the curvature of the Earth or some advanced surveying and
projection techniques believed to be the exclusive domain of modern science
- is nowadays utterly dismissed as a
wishful fantasy.
This often turns into a circular argument. Because no
ancient civilization clearly possessed the scientific or technological
instruments required to achieve such precision alignments, then any alignment must be the product of chance or
coincidence. This is, not to speak of the reason why
ancient civilizations should have deliberately placed their sacred sites along
a grid or system of geodetic and landscape alignments of some sort. More on this
later.
Three Pyramids and a “Star” Mountain
Ancient Mexico is an excellent
ground for the study of ancient alignments. Not only do we find a continuity of
civilization and beliefs going back thousands of years, from the Aztecs,
Toltecs, Maya and Teotihuacan, down to the mysterious Olmecs; but we also find
more pyramids than in any other Country in the world to verify such a theory (there are no accurate estimates, but the number might easily be in the
thousands).
The
Valley of Mexico, with its vast flat plain once occupied by the ancient lake of
Texcoco and surrounded by high mountains, will be the perfect setting to verify
our theory of alignments.
When
drawing on a map the major ancient sites around the Valley of Mexico, almost immediately an
interesting pattern starts to emerge.
There are three major Aztec pyramids
within the boundaries of present day Mexico City: these are the Templo Mayor of México-Tenochtitlán, the Templo Mayor of Tlatelolco and that of Tenayuca.
All
these constructions share very similar characteristics: they were built around
the same time period, between the XIV and the early XVI Century AD, and were
all subject at some point to Aztec rule, erected by people sharing a similar
system of myths and beliefs. They all consist of a large pyramid platform,
surmounted by a double sanctuary and enclosed within a sacred precinct. Let me
state this again: These are the three largest pyramids within present day
Mexico City, and are virtually identical in construction and design [2]; yet, no one has
apparently noticed (up to this day), that they are also very precisely
aligned among each other.
Let’s
take a closer look:
Tenochtitlán
The great Aztec capital of Tenochtitlán was built on an island in the center of the
lake of Texcoco, subsequently enlarged with the construction of artificial
dykes and canals. At the very center of the City, within the sacred precinct,
was the great Teocalli, the Templo Mayor, with its twin sanctuaries dedicated to the
gods Tlaloc and Huitzilopochtli. Built as a massive pyramid, the temple had at
least seven stages of construction, dating from 1337 to 1521 AD. At its peak,
the temple measured 100 by 80 meters at its base, and reached between 45 and 60
meters in height. Its impressive ruins, discovered in 1978 after centuries of
abandonment and deliberate destruction, are still one of the major tourist
attractions in downtown Mexico City.
Tlatelolco
Tlatelolco was a sort of sister
city to México-Tenochtitlán, also built on an island in the lake of Texcoco. The
city itself was founded by a dissident Aztec faction only 13 years after the
founding of México-Tenochtitlán, in 1338 AD. Like the Templo Mayor
of its sister city, also the great pyramid of Tlatelolco underwent
several construction stages – at least seven, whose imposing ruins still
survive in what is today Plaza de las Tres Culturas. The last construction
stage had similar dimensions to the Templo Mayor of
México-Tenochtitlán, measuring some 80 by 70 meters at the base, and also included a double
sanctuary at the top dedicated to the gods Tlaloc and Huitzilopochtli.
Tenayuca
Tenayuca was an old settlement of the Chichimecas, whose foundation might be traced back to as early as 1064
AD. The last stage of construction of this pyramid, which was likely the
prototype of all later Aztec pyramids, measured 68 by 76 meters at its base,
and also underwent several stages of construction and reconstruction (at least
eight). Also at Tenayuca, a twin stairway led to the double sanctuary on top of
the massive pyramid. Interestingly, the
pyramid of Tenayuca does not share the same equinoctial orientation as the
Templo Mayor of México-Tenochtitlán and Tlatelolco, but is rather oriented
towards the setting of the star Aldebaran, in the constellation of Taurus, 17
degrees north of the ideal East-West orientation on the day of the passing of
the Sun at its zenith. [3]
The Alignment Tenayuca – Tlatelolco – Tenochtitlán – Cerro de la
Estrella
The main system of ancient alignments around the Templo Mayor of México-Tenochtitlan. [Reconstruction by Author, courtesy Google Maps] |
It is easy to realize that a
line drawn through the summit of the Templo Mayor of
México-Tenochtitlán and the Templo Mayor of
Tlatelolco would terminate exactly on the main sanctuary of the pyramid of
Tenayuca.
To
further confirm and reinforce the existence of this alignment, it should be noted that one of the major
road arteries in present day Mexico City, the Calzada
Vallejo, follows exactly this same alignment between Tlatelolco and Tenayuca.
This is not surprising, given that the modern road follows the track of
one of the ancient causeways that crossed the – now dry
- lake of Texcoco in Aztec times.
A
prolongation of this alignment towards the South-East also leads to another
very important landmark in Mexico City. This time, it is not a pyramid, but
rather a steep, forested hill called Cerro de la Estrella. Again, this can be no chance: The Cerro de la Estrella
played a very important role in the sacred geography of the Valley of Mexico,
as it is the spot where the Aztecs celebrated the New Fire ceremony every 52 years, at
the end of each calendar cycle and the beginning of a new one.
The etymology of
the name is unclear; Cerro de la Estrella
meaning “Mountain of the Star”, supposedly after a colonial hacienda by the same name built on its slopes soon after the
Spanish conquest of Mexico. The ancient name of the hill, which rises 224 meters above
the surrounding plain, was Huizachtecatl,
meaning a forested hill in ancient Nahuatl. Yet the highly evocative name of
“Mountain of the Star” could have a much more profound astronomical
significance that we do not yet fully understand.
A
pyramid was built by the Aztecs on top of the Cerro de la
Estrella, but the occupation of the site dates back at least 3,000
years. A large settlement occupied the slopes of the hill between 100 and 650
AD, contemporary with the rise of the power of Teotihuacan in the valley of Mexico, on the North-Western shore of the lake of Texcoco.
Interestingly,
the alignment would not appear to point towards the summit of the hill, but rather
deviates a couple of degrees to the West towards a little eminence on its Western slope.
In
2006, a massive pyramid was discovered on the Northern slopes of Cerro de la Estrella, measuring as much as 150 meters at its
base, one wonders what might still lie buried at this fascinating site. [4]
The picture expands
For how interesting the
alignments we have discovered so far, these would have been certainly within the
technical capabilities of the Aztecs: The longest distance in the alignment,
that is the one between Tenayuca and Cerro de la Estrella,
is only 22.5 Km, meaning that the hill would have been within a clear line of
sight connecting Tenayuca to the great temples of Tlatelolco and Tenochtitlán. This
was even truer in ancient times, without the pollution and haze of modern day
Mexico City.
Interestingly,
the Templo Mayor of Tenochtitlan is located
exactly at the same distance of 11.3 Km from Tenayuca and Cerro de la
Estrella, being at the exact center of the imaginary line connecting
these two points (1:1).
And what
about the position of Tlatelolco? The great pyramid of Tlatelolco is
located only 1.9 Km from the Templo Mayor of
Tenochtitlán. That means, Tlatelolco divides the line connecting the pyramid of
Tenayuca to that of Tenochtitlán in two segments of 1.9 and 9.4 Km; the total
segment length being 11.3 Km. This means that the distance Tenochtitlán-Tlatelolco
is exactly 1:5 of the distance
Tlatelolco-Tenayuca.
And
there is more. This first alignment Tenayuca-Tlatelolco-Tenochtitlán-Cerro de la Estrella appears to be at a right angle with
another equally impressive alignment, also crossing through the Templo Mayor of México-Tenochtitlán.
The alignment Texcoco-Tenochtitlan-Chapultepec
This
second alignment connects the ancient city of Texcoco to the sacred hill of
Chapultepec, and in doing so crosses the axis Tenayuca-Cerro de la Estrella
at a right angle exactly in its center, that is on the spot occupied by the Templo Mayor of México Tenochtitlán.
The
Cerro de Chapultepec, whose summit is
now occupied by the castle built for Emperor Maximilian I of Mexico in the XIX
century, was considered sacred by the Aztecs. There the Aztec emperors had
their baths and gardens, and a temple likely existed on the summit. Several
astronomical and geodetic markers are still to be found on the high cliffs
below the castle, including some fine bas-reliefs of Moctezuma II and a giant rock
sculpture of a snake.
On
the opposite end of the alignment, Texcoco was one of the cities of the Aztec
triple alliance, together with México Tenochtitlan and Tlacopán (Tacuba). A
city of the Acolhuas, Texcoco became one of the most important cities in
ancient Mexico during the reign of Netzahualcoyotl, extending itself over 450
hectares on the shores of Lake Texcoco. The city became a major center of
learning, and has been often described as the “Athens” of ancient America;
home of poets, philosophers and astronomers, as well as to one of the largest
libraries of the pre-Columbian world. The great temple of Texcoco was
apparently second only to the one of México-Tenochtitlan, and the legendary
palace of Netzahualcoyotl, consisting of some 300 rooms and all built of
dressed stone, was still a wonder to behold at the time of Bullock’s visit in
1824. [5]
An ancient depiction of the Templo Mayor of Texcoco, with its twin sanctuaries at the top, from the Codex Ixtlilxochitl , early 16th Century [Codex Ixtlilxochitl, fol. 112V] |
Very
little remains nowadays of the former glory of Texcoco. The last remnants of
the great temple of Texcoco were demolished sometime around 1880 to make
material for construction, but its location is accurately marked in XIX century
maps at a place known as “Cerro de La Simona”,
along the present day Calle Guerrero, and between the Calles Allende and Aldama. This position
allows drawing a precise alignment between the Templo Mayor
of Texcoco and the Templo Mayor of
México-Tenochtitlan, pointing to the sacred hill of Chapultepec (itself a major
natural landmark on the immediate shores of what was then the lake of Texcoco).
The alignment Texcoco-Cerro de la Estrella-Cerro del Ajusco
Something
very interesting also happens when observing the alignment between Texcoco and the Cerro
de la Estrella. A prolongation of this line points straight to the summit of
the Ajusco; the highest peak, with its 3,930 meters, within modern Mexico City
boundaries and one of the most easily recognizable landmarks in the entire
valley of Mexico (its highest point, called Pico del Aguila
or Eagle’s peak was considered sacred since ancient times, and does indeed
resemble a giant spread eagle from the distance).
The triangle Texcoco-Teotihuacan-Mount Tlaloc
Texcoco
is also at the vertex of an isosceles triangle, that if forms with the ancient
sacred sites of Teotihuacan and Mount Tlaloc. The distance between Texcoco and
Teotihuacan and between Texcoco and the summit of Mount Tlaloc is the same and
equals 12.5 Km. This is suggestive of a system of survey points or triangulation
markers.
Teotihuacan
was one of the major ceremonial centers of the classic period in the valley of
Mexico, a city whose influence extended as far as Guatemala and the Maya
region. On the other hand, Mount Tlaloc, with its 4,151 meters, is one of the
highest points in the valley of Mexico, and a sacred mountain connected with
the cult of the rain-god Tlaloc. The pre-Hispanic sanctuary on its summit is
believed to be the highest archaeological site in the world, and consists of an
imposing platform approached by a stone causeway, from whose summit the view
easily embraces the entire valley of Mexico and beyond.
Connecting the dots
After
connecting all the dots, the resulting figure resembles an enormous kite,
having at its four vertices the sacred sites of Texcoco, Tenayuca, Cerro de la
Estrella and Chapultepec. The observation points of Cerro del Ajusco, Monte
Tlaloc and Teotihuacan remain outside of this figure, but are placed
symmetrically with respect to each other and to the overall figure on the
ground. The Templo Mayor of México-Tenochtitlan
occupies the center of this scheme, at the intersection of the two major
alignments.
It
is interesting to note that while the location of the great temples of Texcoco,
Tenayuca, Tenochtitlan and Tlatelolco, as well as of the sacred city of
Teotihuacan, reflects a deliberate artificial construction, the natural
landmarks of Chapultepec, Cerro de la Estrella, Mount Tlaloc and Cerro del Ajusco
are prominent landscape features over which human design could have had no role.
It
was probably from the observation that the remarkable hill of Cerro de la
Estrella lies virtually at the center of the triangle formed by three other major
natural landmarks: the Cerro de Chapultepec, Cerro del Ajusco and Monte Tlaloc, that the position of all the other sites could be determined.
The
prominent role of Teotihuacan in this system of alignments suggests that at
least part of this design might date back to the time in which the great city
exerted its dominion over all of Central Mexico (that is, at least in the 2nd
Century BC), a time therefore much earlier than that of the Aztecs.
The
location of the great temple and the city of Texcoco was likely defined relative
to that of Teotihuacan (which already existed at the time), of Mount Tlaloc, Cerro de la
Estrella, Cerro del Ajusco and Chapultepec. This location is almost “miraculous” in that
it is exactly equidistant between Teotihuacan and Mount Tlaloc, and is also
found on the prolongation of the natural alignment between the Cerro del Ajusco
and Cerro de la Estrella.
The
position of the Templo Mayor of
México-Tenochtitlan was subsequently defined along the line of sight between
Texcoco and Chapultepec, in such a way that it would perpendicularly intersect a line drawn through the Cerro de la Estrella and to Tenayuca.
The
location of Tlatelolco is even more interesting, in that it is situated along
the axis Cerro de la Estrella – Tenochtitlan – Tenayuca, and also marks the
point in which a line of sight drawn from Teotihuacan to the Cerro de Chapultepec
intersects this latter axis.
This
systems suggests a very advanced (for the time) knowledge
of cartography and trigonometry for the purpose of triangulation, and also
highlights the existence of a network of alignments of sacred sites based on ancient
lines of sight, which has surprisingly gone virtually unnoticed for the past 500 years. It also suggests that the location chosen for some of the major
temples and ancient cities in the valley of Mexico, including the very Aztec capital of
México-Tenochtitlan, is not arbitrary,
but rather the product of an elaborate geodetic scheme that incorporates pre-existing
natural as well as artificial landmarks.
References
[1] The Board of Longitude, established in 1714, rewarded John
Harrison for the invention of the marine chronometer in 1773. Before that,
longitude could only be crudely determined with the so called “Lunar distance method”, first devised by Galileo Galilei in
1612, who noticed that the relative positions of the Moon and Jupiter could be
used as a sort of universal clock; a method which however required accurate
knowledge of their orbits and cycles.
[2] The
chief archaeologist and director of excavations at Tlatelolco, Salvador
Guilliem, even goes to the point of suggesting that these three pyramids, those
of Tlatelolco, Tenayuca and Tenochtitlán, bear such close similarities to each
other that can only be explained if they were erected by the same builders.
Descubren en Tlatelolco Pirámide más antigua que Tenochtitlán, in La Jornada, 27/12/2007,
accessed on-line: http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2007/12/27/index.php?section=cultura&article=a04n1cul
[3] Enrique Juan Palacios, La Orientación de la Pirámide de Tenayuca y el principio del año y
siglo indígenas, Contribución al XXV Congreso de Americanistas de la
Plata, Buenos Aires, 1932. Accessed on-line:
http://www.revistadelauniversidad.unam.mx/ojs_rum/files/journals/1/articles/4006/public/4006-9404-1-PB.pdf
[4] Massive Ancient Pyramid Discovered
in Mexico, The Guardian, 4th May, 2005. Accessed on-line: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/12173346/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/massive-ancient-pyramid-discovered-mexico/#.VaWZ2qRViko
[5] William Bullock, Six Months Residence and Travels in Mexico, London, 1824, p.
383-395